Voyager Technologies Inc Dossier
|
SectorIndustrials IndustryAerospace & Defense Beta (adjusted)1.00 Intrinsic Value $30.88median of 2 methodsbased on filings through 30 Jun 2026 Market Price $30.25Price as of 30 Sep 2026 Near fair valueIntrinsic value is 2% above the market price −50% · IV below pricenear fair value ±15%IV above price · +50% Data confidence Sign in to view data confidence Market Cap $1.8B Enterprise Value $1.9B Shares Outstanding 61M diluted Next Earnings Date2 Nov 2026 All prices and values are periodic snapshots, not live quotes. Source dates are shown for reference. ThesisStreet consensus, scenarios, merits, risks, and invalidation triggers Thesis Summary Voyager Technologies, Inc. is a rapidly growing defense and space technology company positioned at the convergence of national security, space infrastructure, and advanced capability development. Following its successful IPO in June 2025, the company has demonstrated strong commercial momentum, highlighted by a record backlog of $275.3 million as of Q1 2026 and raised FY2026 revenue guidance of $230 million to $255 million (representing 39% to 53% year-over-year growth). Key growth drivers include its spectrum dominance solutions, strategic systems (including controllable solid-fuel propulsion), and the development of the Starlab Commercial Space Station to succeed the ISS. While the company continues to operate at a net loss due to heavy scaling investments, its robust liquidity of $641.4 million and strategic acquisitions, such as the pending purchase of lunar delivery pioneer Astrobotic Technology, provide a solid foundation for long-term value creation. This section is the 12-month view: analyst targets and the probability-weighted scenarios built from them. The intrinsic value at the top of this page answers a different question: what the business is worth today. Street view · analyst 12-month targets Low · most bearish analyst$21.00 Mean target$45.55 High · most bullish analyst$65.00 Our research · scenarios, merits, risks, and invalidation triggersResearch as of 18 Sep 2026 Scenarios · 12-month scenario targets Bear CaseDownside scenario $21.0020% Integration delays with Astrobotic Technology and higher-than-expected R&D expenses for Starlab widen net losses and accelerate cash burn. Customer concentration risks materialize if U.S. government defense or NASA civil space budgets face delays or reductions, leading to downward revisions in forward guidance. Base CaseCentral scenario $45.5550% Matches the consensus meanVoyager successfully executes on its $275.3 million backlog, meeting its raised FY2026 revenue guidance of $230 million to $255 million. The redomestication to Texas optimizes operational costs, and the Starlab development continues to hit key NASA milestones, maintaining a steady path toward commercial operations by 2030. Bull CaseUpside scenario $65.0030% Accelerated defense spending and rapid commercialization of space infrastructure drive revenue above the high end of guidance. Starlab secures additional high-margin commercial and international payloads, while the integration of Astrobotic Technology establishes Voyager as the premier end-to-end lunar infrastructure provider, leading to positive Adjusted EBITDA ahead of schedule. Scenarios are anchored to street consensus at the research date, with our probabilities and rationale. Key Investment Merits
Key Investment Risks
Thesis Invalidation Triggers
All scenarios are estimates and subject to change. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Quality Pillars MembersThis section is available to registered members. Create a free account or sign in to unlock the full breakdown. Explore this dossierValuationIntrinsic value, the six-method breakdown, peer medians, and your assumptions sandbox.Financial SnapshotRevenue, profitability, returns, balance sheet, dividends, and the filing-level detail.Qualitative AnalysisBusiness overview, strategic initiatives, and mergers, acquisitions & partnerships.Outlook & Key DatesForward estimates, reporting calendar, and the monitoring framework. |